In what may go down as one of the biggest classic blunders since getting involved in a land war in Asia, John McCain has selected Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his vice-President. You can read the official statement here.
U.S. Senator John McCain today announced that he has selected Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to be his running mate and to serve as his vice president.Governor Palin is a tough executive who has demonstrated during her time in office that she is ready to be president. She has brought Republicans and Democrats together within her Administration and has a record of delivering on the change and reform that we need in Washington.
I cannot emphasize enough how bad a pick this is. As I wrote last week:
History teaches us that despite the levels of disrespect typically heaped on the office of vice president, the fact remains that many Vice Presidents have gone on to become President themselves, either through succession or through incapacity. Accordingly, the most important question to ask about any vice presidential nominee is not about whether he “balances the ticket” or “helps the campaign narrative.” The most important ask about a vice presidential nominee is simply this:If something happens, would he make a good President?
Or, in this case, she. Let’s take a quick look at Alaska, shall we? Alaska is unique among all the 50 states in that it is uniquely socialist. Individuals in Alaska don’t pay state income or sales taxes–the state gets over 80% of its revenues from oil companies. Individuals in Alaska actually get money from the government every year. And if the state government needs more money, it doesn’t have to worry about backlash from their citizens by raising taxes or cutting spending–it just has to raise taxes on oil, which is a low-risk political move for it. Let’s not forget, either, that Alaska is also one of the biggest recipients of federal pork. Remember the “bridge to nowhere”? Alaska’s congressmen are notorious for bringing federal dollars into the state.
Being governor of Alaska is like being the governor of a fantasyland where wishing makes it so and you never have to make hard choices. Because of its luck in being a source of oil, it doesn’t have to balance tax revenues and economic growth. Because of its small population, its Senators are uniquely disproportionately powerful, as they are pretty constantly re-elected (although this election year may provide a turning point for that)–a power they use to bring in more pork and provide fewer worries to the state government on how to fund projects.
In other words, the governor of Alaska never has to make tough decisions, never has to balance economic growth and the functions of government. The total population being so low and spread out, crime isn’t a major worry. The disproportionately high levels of revenue compared to population means that the schools are well funded and the roads stay paved.
In short, being governor of Alaska does absolutely zero to prepare one for being president of the United States. In fact, it might actually be negative experience because it’s so different. So if we are to judge a VP by what kind of President they would make, Palin falls well short of the mark.
This is especially true when you consider that if McCain is elected President, he will be 73 years old upon taking office. Now, I think that McCain does have the mental capacity to be President. However, his age simply increases his risk of dying or being incapacitated in office. It is utter irresponsibility and lack of judgment on his part to choose Sarah Palin has his VP.
Update:
One good thing about Palin I did not know when I wrote this post is that she actually killed the “bridge to nowhere” project. So props for that. Of course, by that time she was already an established political enemy of Ted Stevens, so was that good governance or spite? Unfortunately, she doesn’t have a long enough record to judge which is which.

[...] Heretical Ideas [...]
You have to admit that Sarah Palin is pretty hot (remember she was in the Ms. Alaska Pageant) and MUCH BETTER on the eyes than Joe Biden. Oh and wait until you see the bikini pics!!! NOT BAD for a mother of 5.
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=5055328
Yummmy. I don’t agree with her political positions but I wouldn’t mind trying out a few positions with her. She looks like the kind of woman who yearns andstrives to be on top.
I don’t agree with her political positions but I’d be willing to try out a few positions with her.
I think you have been infatuated by the messiah obamma and his BIG CHANGE to the point you have an obammagasm just listening to his bull(say anything to get elected)shit. She isn’t phoney like those two dumbocratic pukes biden and bama. She will be a welcome improvement change to “politic as usual”.
Listen to the gnashing of teeth starting already…..
She’s young, attractive, from outside the beltway, and has a history of no-BS politics. No wonder you hate her . . .
Interesting that you mentioned the Bridge to Nowhere, but neglected to mention that she was the one who killed it, not your vaunted Obamessiah.
Fear, I smell fear from the embittered left. You thought this would be a coronation and not an election. Oopsie!
Hate her? I just don’t think she’d make a good President. I don’t have any feelings about her personally one way or the other. I’m sure she’s a wonderful governor of Alaska. Of course, like I said, it’s not a particularly challenging job.
It may seem intuitive that crime isn’t a major worry in Alaska, but according to the Census Bureau, they had the 7th-worst rate of violent crime in 2004 (murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault), and according to various statistics I’ve seen, the highest rate of rape of any state in the country. I don’t want to put all of the blame for this on Alaska’s state government, but I wanted to point out that there is indeed a crime problem in Alaska, for one reason or another. This says more about Alaska and its other politicians than it does about Palin, of course, but it’s still interesting, or terrifying, if you’re a woman living in Alaska. At least they’ll let you carry a gun there…
The problem for McCain is that he has been making the point that we need experienced leadership, and he says Obama is lacking in that category. So now he picks a woman whose political experience amounts to being Mayor of a town of 3,500 people, and who served half a term as Governor of Alaska. Given that McCain is old and in poor health, there is a possibility that he won’t be able to serve out his term if elected. And Palin is next in line to the Presidency. Ouch.
Whatever one’s political ideology, I think most voters will feel more comfortable with an old pro like Joe Biden as a possible Chief Executive.
McCain/Palin - a Great ticket for both racists *and* sexists!
Evolution is only a theory - and it doesn’t apply to republicans.
I thought that Obama couldn’t have gone further contrary to his platforms by picking Biden. It seems McCain has proven me wrong.
Actually, Palin was an enthusiastic supporter of the Bridge to Nowhere as long as it was being paid for by the nation’s taxpayers as an earmark. She said publicly that she was grateful that the Alaska Congressional delegation (read: Ted Stevens) was in such a strong position to get Congress to allocate the money for the bridge.
It was only after Congress was embarrassed into canceling the earmark, leaving the State of Alaska in a position where her administration would have to pay for the bridge itself that she canceled the bridge.
Her statements in support of the bridge, her ciriticism of Congress for withdrawing the earmark, and her comments about how her state wouldn’t pay for what she expected us tax-payers to fund are all on the public record. BTW, am I the only one who has noticed that in the last day, she pulled the ad by Ted Stevens (father of the Bridge to Nowhere earmark) praising her and supporting her 2006 gubernatorial campaign from her website? A bit more historical revisionism.
It seems that even in her very first speech to a national audience, she couldn’t resist the temptation to distort her own public record, do a 180% flip-flop, and lie blatantly about something already on the public record. It appears that she has what it takes to be a solid (or is that solid waste) participant in today’s cynical, dishonest cesspool politics.
Good choice, McCain - a novice, but one willing to play the same old politics of lies and distortions.
Experience and judgement don’t really matter. Karl Rove and Dick Cheney would do all the thinking for them, anyway.
The Repukes have a long glorious history of putting up puppets for people to vote for. Look at Reagan- he was senile the entire time he was in the White House. Nancy Reagan was having his agenda set by a freakin’ psychic (kind of amazing the Christian Right still talks glowingly of a man who would abide such Satanic practices).
I love how this article totally bashes Palin and yet McCain’s people stil choose to advertise on it.
hy, Give something to help the hungry people from Africa or India,
I added this blog about them:
on http://tinyurl.com/65dptv